Paradox Upstream recorded a decrease of 5.45% in total oil and gas production to 1,556.02 boe/d in June 2020 when compared with the previous month, according to GlobalData’s USL48 database.
The oil and gas production of Paradox Upstream grew 12.26% in June 2020 from 1,386.06 boe/d in June 2019.
On a YTD basis, the company’s total oil and gas production increased by 2.85% from the same period in 2019.
The company’s oil production declined 1.57% to 50.1 bd in June 2020 from the previous month, while gas production declined by 5.62% to 8.73 mmcf/d. On a YTD basis, oil production decreased by 48.11% in 2020 when compared with the same period in 2019, while gas production rose by 7.36%. Out of the total oil and gas production in June 2020, oil production held a 3.22% share, while gas production held a 96.73% share.
Looking at the states where Paradox Upstream recorded the highest oil and gas production in June 2020, Colorado figured at the top, accounting for an 81.34% share. The company produced 858.07 boe/d in the state in June 2020, a decrease of 5.95% from the previous month.
On a YTD basis, the company produced 5,770.31 boe/d in Colorado in 2020, recording a decrease of 41.56% from the same period in 2019.
Paradox Upstream witnessed the highest oil and gas production in San Miguel county in June 2020. Out of all the counties, San Miguel county held a share of 55.15% for the firm. The company produced 858.07 boe/d in San Miguel county in June 2020, a decrease of 5.95% in production when compared with the previous month.
On a YTD basis, the county produced 5,770.31 boe/d for the company in 2020, an 11.74% decrease from the same period in 2019.
All publicly announced wells data are included in this analysis, which is drawn from GlobalData’s USL48 database that provides insights into oil and gas permits and wells as disclosed by state ministry sites.
GlobalData collects the latest production data and analyses the trends when it is made available for public disclosure by state ministries. Differences, if any, between the period of activity and the article date may be attributed to delays in the issuance of data.