Revolution Operating recorded an increase of 7.14% in total oil and gas production to 10,425.65 boe/d in April 2020 when compared with the previous month, according to GlobalData’s USL48 database.
The oil and gas production of Revolution Operating declined 24.76% in April 2020 from 13,857 boe/d in April 2019.
On a YTD basis, the company’s total oil and gas production decreased by 28.87% from the same period in 2019.
The company’s oil production declined 0.89% to 2,759.91 bd in April 2020 from the previous month, while gas production up by 6.8% to 38.94 mmcf/d. On a YTD basis, oil production decreased by 43.36% in 2020 when compared with the same period in 2019, while gas production declined by 12.77%. Out of the total oil and gas production in April 2020, oil production held a 26.47% share, while gas production held a 64.4% share.
Looking at the states where Revolution Operating recorded the highest oil and gas production in April 2020, Texas figured at the top, accounting for a 100% share. The company produced 8,033.19 boe/d in the state in April 2020, an increase of 10.9% from the previous month.
On a YTD basis, the company produced 31,936.31 boe/d in Texas in 2020, recording a decrease of 45.56% from the same period in 2019.
Revolution Operating witnessed the highest oil and gas production in Lipscomb county in April 2020. Out of all the counties, Lipscomb county held a share of 56.99% for the firm. The company produced 5,941.79 boe/d in Lipscomb county in April 2020, an increase of 8.98% in production when compared with the previous month.
On a YTD basis, the county produced 24,246.79 boe/d for the company in 2020, a 27.54% decrease from the same period in 2019.
All publicly announced wells data are included in this analysis, which is drawn from GlobalData’s USL48 database that provides insights into oil and gas permits and wells as disclosed by state ministry sites.
GlobalData collects the latest production data and analyses the trends when it is made available for public disclosure by state ministries. Differences, if any, between the period of activity and the article date may be attributed to delays in the issuance of data.