Sabinal Energy Operating recorded an increase of 58.99% in total oil and gas production to 15,637.22 boe/d in June 2020 when compared with the previous month, according to GlobalData’s USL48 database.
The oil and gas production of Sabinal Energy Operating declined 13.22% in June 2020 from 18,019.78 boe/d in June 2019.
On a YTD basis, the company’s total oil and gas production decreased by 13.94% from the same period in 2019.
The company’s oil production grew 58.5% to 14,478.05 bd in June 2020 from the previous month, while gas production up by 65.52% to 6.72 mmcf/d. On a YTD basis, oil production decreased by 13.98% in 2020 when compared with the same period in 2019, while gas production declined by 13.53%. Out of the total oil and gas production in June 2020, oil production held a 92.59% share, while gas production held a 7.41% share.
Looking at the states where Sabinal Energy Operating recorded the highest oil and gas production in June 2020, Texas figured at the top, accounting for a 100% share. The company produced 15,279.02 boe/d in the state in June 2020, an increase of 57.04% from the previous month.
On a YTD basis, the company produced 91,784.6 boe/d in Texas in 2020, recording a decrease of 15.89% from the same period in 2019.
Sabinal Energy Operating witnessed the highest oil and gas production in Hockley county in June 2020. Out of all the counties, Hockley county held a share of 31.69% for the firm. The company produced 4,955.53 boe/d in Hockley county in June 2020, an increase of 43.31% in production when compared with the previous month.
On a YTD basis, the county produced 29,167.59 boe/d for the company in 2020, an 11.31% decrease from the same period in 2019.
All publicly announced wells data are included in this analysis, which is drawn from GlobalData’s USL48 database that provides insights into oil and gas permits and wells as disclosed by state ministry sites.
GlobalData collects the latest production data and analyses the trends when it is made available for public disclosure by state ministries. Differences, if any, between the period of activity and the article date may be attributed to delays in the issuance of data.