Maple Energy Holdings recorded a decrease of 8.06% in total oil and gas production to 7,332.57 boe/d in May 2020 when compared with the previous month, according to GlobalData’s USL48 database.

The oil and gas production of Maple Energy Holdings declined 25.92% in May 2020 from 9,898.69 boe/d in May 2019.

On a YTD basis, the company’s total oil and gas production increased by 22.16% from the same period in 2019.

The company’s oil production declined 28.56% to 279.42 bd in May 2020 from the previous month, while gas production up by 1.24% to 30.92 mmcf/d. On a YTD basis, oil production decreased by 61.85% in 2020 when compared with the same period in 2019, while gas production rose by 64.75%. Out of the total oil and gas production in May 2020, oil production held a 3.81% share, while gas production held a 72.7% share.


Looking at the states where Maple Energy Holdings recorded the highest oil and gas production in May 2020, Texas figured at the top, accounting for a 100% share. The company produced 7,332.57 boe/d in the state in May 2020, a decrease of 8.06% from the previous month.

On a YTD basis, the company produced 36,832.73 boe/d in Texas in 2020, recording an increase of 22.16% from the same period in 2019.



Maple Energy Holdings witnessed the highest oil and gas production in Reeves county in May 2020. Out of all the counties, Reeves county held a share of 100% for the firm. The company produced 7,332.57 boe/d in Reeves county in May 2020, a decrease of 8.06% in production when compared with the previous month.

On a YTD basis, the county produced 36,832.73 boe/d for the company in 2020, a 22.16% increase from the same period in 2019.



Methodology

All publicly announced wells data are included in this analysis, which is drawn from GlobalData’s USL48 database that provides insights into oil and gas permits and wells as disclosed by state ministry sites.

GlobalData collects the latest production data and analyses the trends when it is made available for public disclosure by state ministries. Differences, if any, between the period of activity and the article date may be attributed to delays in the issuance of data.