Mid-Con Energy Operating recorded a decrease of 3.81% in total oil and gas production to 1,266.52 boe/d in July 2020 when compared with the previous month, according to GlobalData’s USL48 database.
The oil and gas production of Mid-Con Energy Operating declined 19.9% in July 2020 from 1,581.22 boe/d in July 2019.
On a YTD basis, the company’s total oil and gas production decreased by 14.05% from the same period in 2019.
The company’s oil production declined 4.54% to 1,250.16 bd in July 2020 from the previous month, while gas production up by 125% to 0.09 mmcf/d. On a YTD basis, oil production decreased by 14.43% in 2020 when compared with the same period in 2019, while gas production rose by 13.64%. Out of the total oil and gas production in July 2020, oil production held a 98.71% share, while gas production held a 1.23% share.
Looking at the states where Mid-Con Energy Operating recorded the highest oil and gas production in July 2020, Oklahoma figured at the top, accounting for a 14.52% share. The company produced 1,105.89 boe/d in the state in July 2020, a decrease of 4.21% from the previous month.
On a YTD basis, the company produced 8,325.95 boe/d in Oklahoma in 2020, recording a decrease of 26.66% from the same period in 2019.
Mid-Con Energy Operating witnessed the highest oil and gas production in Pawnee county in July 2020. Out of all the counties, Pawnee county held a share of 46.13% for the firm. The company produced 584.28 boe/d in Pawnee county in July 2020, an increase of 0.45% in production when compared with the previous month.
On a YTD basis, the county produced 4,261.07 boe/d for the company in 2020, a 14.53% decrease from the same period in 2019.
Methodology
All publicly announced wells data are included in this analysis, which is drawn from GlobalData’s USL48 database that provides insights into oil and gas permits and wells as disclosed by state ministry sites.
GlobalData collects the latest production data and analyses the trends when it is made available for public disclosure by state ministries. Differences, if any, between the period of activity and the article date may be attributed to delays in the issuance of data.