Proline Energy Resources recorded a decrease of 19.74% in total oil and gas production to 650.4 boe/d in May 2020 when compared with the previous month, according to GlobalData’s USL48 database.

The oil and gas production of Proline Energy Resources declined 31.66% in May 2020 from 951.7 boe/d in May 2019.

On a YTD basis, the company’s total oil and gas production decreased by 31.91% from the same period in 2019.

The company’s oil production declined 72.47% to 14.67 bd in May 2020 from the previous month, while gas production declined by 15.27% to 3.55 mmcf/d. On a YTD basis, oil production decreased by 68.05% in 2020 when compared with the same period in 2019, while gas production declined by 26.76%. Out of the total oil and gas production in May 2020, oil production held a 2.26% share, while gas production held a 94.11% share.


Looking at the states where Proline Energy Resources recorded the highest oil and gas production in May 2020, Texas figured at the top, accounting for a 100% share. The company produced 650.4 boe/d in the state in May 2020, a decrease of 19.74% from the previous month.

On a YTD basis, the company produced 3,686.49 boe/d in Texas in 2020, recording a decrease of 31.91% from the same period in 2019.



Proline Energy Resources witnessed the highest oil and gas production in Rusk county in May 2020. Out of all the counties, Rusk county held a share of 15.91% for the firm. The company produced 103.47 boe/d in Rusk county in May 2020, a decrease of 1.21% in production when compared with the previous month.

On a YTD basis, the county produced 494.33 boe/d for the company in 2020, a 32.48% decrease from the same period in 2019.



Methodology

All publicly announced wells data are included in this analysis, which is drawn from GlobalData’s USL48 database that provides insights into oil and gas permits and wells as disclosed by state ministry sites.

GlobalData collects the latest production data and analyses the trends when it is made available for public disclosure by state ministries. Differences, if any, between the period of activity and the article date may be attributed to delays in the issuance of data.