Capital Star Oil & Gas recorded an increase of 4.57% in total oil and gas production to 2,667.93 boe/d in October 2021 when compared with the previous month, according to GlobalData’s USL48 database.
The oil and gas production of Capital Star Oil & Gas grew 87% in October 2021 from 1,426.71 boe/d in October 2020.
On a YTD basis, the company’s total oil and gas production increased by 58.1% from the same period in 2020.
The company’s oil production declined 3.16% to 2.45 bd in October 2021 from the previous month, while gas production up by 5.26% to 13.2 mmcf/d. On a YTD basis, oil production decreased by 94.49% in 2021 when compared with the same period in 2020, while gas production rose by 52.5%. Out of the total oil and gas production in October 2021, oil production held a 0.09% share, while gas production held an 85.3% share.
Looking at the states where Capital Star Oil & Gas recorded the highest oil and gas production in October 2021, Texas figured at the top, accounting for a 100% share. The company produced 2,667.93 boe/d in the state in October 2021, an increase of 4.57% from the previous month.
On a YTD basis, the company produced 24,861.72 boe/d in Texas in 2021, recording an increase of 58.1% from the same period in 2020.
Capital Star Oil & Gas witnessed the highest oil and gas production in Lavaca county in October 2021. Out of all the counties, Lavaca county held a share of 90.36% for the firm. The company produced 2,410.83 boe/d in Lavaca county in October 2021, an increase of 5.02% in production when compared with the previous month.
On a YTD basis, the county produced 22,270.52 boe/d for the company in 2021, a 57.69% increase from the same period in 2020.
All publicly announced wells data are included in this analysis, which is drawn from GlobalData’s USL48 database that provides insights into oil and gas permits and wells as disclosed by state ministry sites.
GlobalData collects the latest production data and analyses the trends when it is made available for public disclosure by state ministries. Differences, if any, between the period of activity and the article date may be attributed to delays in the issuance of data.