Petrohawk Operating recorded an increase of 108.21% in total oil and gas production to 2,080.56 boe/d in December 2021 when compared with the previous month, according to GlobalData’s USL48 database.
The oil and gas production of Petrohawk Operating grew 186.59% in December 2021 from 725.97 boe/d in December 2020.
On a YTD basis, the company’s total oil and gas production increased by 23.6% from the same period in 2020.
The company’s oil production grew 202.01% to 1,608.08 bd in December 2021 from the previous month, while gas production up by 1.14% to 2.66 mmcf/d. On a YTD basis, oil production increased by 31.6% in 2021 when compared with the same period in 2020, while gas production rose by 15.38%. Out of the total oil and gas production in December 2021, oil production held a 77.29% share, while gas production held a 22.04% share.
Looking at the states where Petrohawk Operating recorded the highest oil and gas production in December 2021, Texas figured at the top, accounting for a 100% share. The company produced 2,080.56 boe/d in the state in December 2021, an increase of 108.21% from the previous month.
On a YTD basis, the company produced 10,425.56 boe/d in Texas in 2021, recording an increase of 23.6% from the same period in 2020.
Petrohawk Operating witnessed the highest oil and gas production in Karnes county in December 2021. Out of all the counties, Karnes county held a share of 64.51% for the firm. The company produced 1,342.1 boe/d in Karnes county in December 2021, an increase of 465.57% in production when compared with the previous month.
On a YTD basis, the county produced 4,975.64 boe/d for the company in 2021, a 2.49% increase from the same period in 2020.
All publicly announced wells data are included in this analysis, which is drawn from GlobalData’s USL48 database that provides insights into oil and gas permits and wells as disclosed by state ministry sites.
GlobalData collects the latest production data and analyses the trends when it is made available for public disclosure by state ministries. Differences, if any, between the period of activity and the article date may be attributed to delays in the issuance of data.