Tuscaloosa Marine Shale witnessed an increase of 14.91% in total oil and gas production to 39,303.36 boe/d in February 2022 when compared with the previous month, according to GlobalData’s USL48 database.

The oil and gas production in Tuscaloosa Marine declined 1.42% in February 2022 from 39,870.52 boe/d in February 2021. On a YTD basis, the total oil and gas production in the play decreased by 11.48% from the same period in 2021.

In Tuscaloosa Marine, oil production grew 12.4% in February 2022 as compared with the previous month, while gas production increased by 16.03% to 158.78 mmcf/d.

On a YTD basis, oil production in the play decreased by 4.34% in 2022 when compared with the same period in 2021, while gas production declined by 14.3%. Out of the total oil and gas production in February 2022, oil held a 30.35% share, while gas had a 69.65% share.


In Tuscaloosa Marine, W & T Offshore emerged as the largest oil and gas producer, recording a total oil and gas production at 20,760.28 boe/d in February 2022, an increase of 14.24% from the previous month. The company held a 0.52% share in oil production and 75.61% share in gas production in February 2022.

On a YTD basis, the company registered a 1.2% decrease in total oil and gas production from the same period in 2021.



Compared with other counties within Tuscaloosa Marine Shale, Baldwin county recorded the highest oil and gas production, holding a 31.53% share in February 2022. The county witnessed a 2.1% increase in production to 12,391.04 boe/d in February 2022 when compared with the previous month.

On a YTD basis, it registered a decline of 2.45% in total production from the same period in 2021.



Methodology

All publicly announced wells data are included in this analysis, which is drawn from GlobalData’s USL48 database that provides insights into oil and gas permits and wells as disclosed by state ministry sites.

GlobalData collects the latest production data and analyses the trends when it is made available for public disclosure by state ministries. Differences, if any, between the period of activity and the article date may be attributed to delays in the issuance of data.